The non-public Variety of the latest Counselor Survey (PST-Q) was created because of the Fernandez-Alvarez mais aussi al

(2003), and you can was designed to determine “the fresh new set of characteristics that each specialist is applicable in just about any psychotherapeutic condition, ergo creating an element of the attributes of new therapeutic operate” (p. 117). Brand new survey analyzes four other dimensions: flexibility-firmness (Educational subscale), distance-intimacy (Expressive subscale), smaller wedding-greater engagement (Engagement subscale), wider centered-thin centered (Attentional subscale) and impulsive-arranged (Medical subscale). It is an effective thirty six-product thinking-statement measure filled out by practitioners that have solutions rated into the a good size ranging from step one (full dispute)to eight (complete arrangement). This new level shows a test-retest accuracy out of .79, having Chronbach’s accuracy coefficients for each and every subscale, as follows; informative, .69; expressive, .75; involvement, .78; attentional, .80; surgical, .78. Factor Data found a beneficial KMO = .756 (Find Dining table 1 to have alphas in the current research).

Working Alliance List-Small Form (WAI-S)

The functional Alliance Catalog (WAI), created by Horvath Greenberg (1986), are a thirty six goods questionnaire that may be given so you’re able to each other readers and you can practitioners and is rated to the good 7-point Likert sort of level from1 (never)so you can seven (always). Tracey and you can Kokotovic (1989) proposed an individual and you will counselor Operating Alliance Catalog-Short Function (WAI-S), that contains four points for every subscale (Task, Objective, and you may Bond) and you may total WAI-S scores, proving high reliability that have leader account similar to, and also much better than new WAI for the therapist subscales and you can full mediocre scores (Activity, leader = .83; Thread, alpha = .91; Purpose, leader = .88; and you will Standard Alliance, leader = .95). Find Dining table step 1 for alphas in the present study.

Processes Checklist (TL)

The methods List scale is modified of Hollis (1995), exactly who catalogued an intensive variety of guidance and you may psychotherapy techniques representing a broad spectrum of philosophical angles. In order to hone that it comprehensive listing according to techniques used specifically by cognitive behavioural and you will constructivist cures orientations, i recruited counseling therapy scholar college students to read the total directory of 108 medication procedure and you can rate new the quantity to which each method is employed by each healing strategy (intellectual behavioural and constructivist), using a 5-point Likert sort of level from a single (Never ever or Hardly ever) so you can 5 (Always or Always).

Steps

Sixteen counseling psychology graduate students participated in these ratings (six men, 10 women), with the M_age = (SD = 2.67). Results of a paired differences analysis for all 108 items indicated that there were 77 techniques rated as being used with significantly differential frequency by cognitive behavioral and constructivist therapies. We then divided this distribution of 77 techniques into quartiles and retained the top and bottom quartiles. This resulted in 20 cognitive behavioral techniques (e.g.advice giving, rational restructuring) and 20 constructivist techniques (e.g. emotional processing, reflection) that were rated most significantly different (cognitive behavioral vs. constructivist). This final list of 40 https://datingranking.net/local-hookup/el-paso items of therapy techniques (20 cognitive behavioral techniques; 20 constructivist techniques) was used in the current study.

Such 40 issues were indexed alphabetically and you may users had been expected in order to speed the the amount that they use each approach inside their practice of treatment along an effective 5-section scale from a single (Never ever or Almost never)to help you 5 (Usually or Almost always). The latest reviews of your own 20 rationalist products was indeed summed and you may an excellent indicate was computed to help you reflect the common volume of utilizing rationalist interventions (you’ll assortment = 1-5), while the exact same procedure was used when it comes to the fresh new 20 constructivist interventions.

Brand new raw analysis was used so you’re able to run an excellent confirmatory basis data on the Process List level. The current research is checked out for multiple-variate normalcy as well as the presumptions was basically came across. The kurtosis estimates into the variables fell ranging from step one and you will –1 parameters except constructivist things several, thirteen, sixteen, and you can 20 and you can cognitive behavioral goods 3, which had a great kurtosis opinions anywhere between dos and you may –dos. Therefore, this type of five points were taken out of the brand new level just before powering the fresh confirmatory foundation investigation.