The Prostate Express – A Symptom of an American Health care Tragedy

A Medical study published by Harvard medical School in association with the Karolinsks Institute in Sweden has been published. University of Iceland, Reykjavik and several Boston hospitals, have my dander up right now. The end result of the analysis is : “prostate cancer increases the quick risks of suicide and cardio death,” it said. The scientists found that the danger was particularly excessive during the very first month after a prostate cancer diagnosis.

What has my ire elevated is the analysis makes nary a mention of what procedure action was taken by the medical community in the month or year following the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Which leads me to “The Prostate Express.” Every year, 100 American men go to Germany to go through hypothermia therapy for prostate cancer. The American healthcare industry is dominated by chemotherapy and radiation, and hyperthermia does not have serious side effects.

In my opinion, therapy for prostate cancer has much greater effect on suicide and cardiovascular deaths than a diagnosis of cancer. But when I review it really large study (linked at the conclusion) there’s absolute silence about the cancer treatment options followed by the study’s individuals. Here is a good illustration of the present status of prostate health care in America. Call him Bill, our compound American patient. Bill has his annual checkup from his doctor. He receives a prostate specific antigen (PSA) test along with the popular electronic finger wag test as part of his call.

Whenever the PSA test comes back with a reading of 7.0, Bill is referred to an urologist. The urologist provides Bill an additional PSA examination, an additional test of the finger wag. Based upon those findings, the urologist functions a needle biopsy called a “punch test,” in which half a dozen core samples are collected from Bill’s prostate gland. Bill stated once the lab results returned, he was told that cancer cells were present in four of 6 tissue samples.

Furthermore, the pathologist who completed the lab work best supplement for prostate (marysvilleglobe.com) Bill assigned a 5 Gleason score. (The Gleason score is very subjective with hand counts of cancer cells, a view on differentiation from normal prostate cells, and a viewpoint on the colors which cancer cells take in the examined tissue samples.) Following receiving the pathologists laboratory report the urologist schedules Bill for another session. He tells Bill that the results are consistent with prostate cancer. The urologist suggests that Bill have a major prostatectomy, which would eliminate the whole prostate gland.

Bill Bill vaguely remembers hearing that he might lose command of his urinary roles and his sex life would change. However Bill really hears, “If we go in now, we should be able to obtain all.” And, “if we remove it immediately your odds of survival are 90 % plus”. Therefore Bill, a typical American man, scared to death or the possibility of dying, says “Get’er Done.” Only after the surgery does Bill recognize the significance of what he didn’t hear clearly. “You is going to lose control of your urinary function,” as well as “sexual purpose is going to be just about gone”.

One year later, Bill continues to be putting on a diaper. He only needs one diaper per day some days, and another he makes use of more often. Bill’s wife moved out six months back along with the divorce was final last week. Stimulant photos had been tested on Bill’s penis, but it failed to do the job. He doesn’t yet resolve to become a monk and aspires to the potential for a penal implant.

Now back to Harvard’s Prostate research and also the subject of my post, “The prostate Express.” Where did the information from the analysis come from? What procedures did the prostate patients undergo? Which individuals received a radical prostectomy? Who had been the people who got radiation? What types of cancer sufferers have undergone chemotherapy? What patients have been provided different combinations? No one of the essential treatment data is presented or talked about in the current study. We are not advised of individuals that chose to do nothing and refused to receive traditional treatments. Nowhere are we educated of those patients who selected alternative or integrative therapies and chose to travel abroad for different remedies in Germany, Japan, Italy, etc.