Then, i determined the possibility organization anywhere between these variables and you can sociocultural affairs, by undertaking Chisquared examination

To evaluate all of our next hypothesis, we very first recoded, for every of the items into condition level, the latest portion of responses that inform you if husbands have less, equivalent or maybe more ratings, namely, condition, which have hypogamy, which means that husbands has actually down updates than spouses, homogamy, definition equal position, and you may hypergamy, meaning husbands with highest condition than simply wives. Into prospective connection from nation, analyses was in fact extreme in knowledge (X 2 =eleven.9; df=2; p=.003; n=.20), and you will economic impact off a prospective separation and divorce (X dos =9.51; df=2; p=.009; n=.18). Data showed that, to possess Foreign-language users, there was alot more training hypogamy, while to own Dominican people there can be more knowledge homogamy. Towards monetary circumstances in the eventuality of split up, while there is a great deal more homogamy to have Spanish professionals, there’s way more hypergamy to have Dominicans (pick Figure step 1).

That have previous failed marriages or otherwise not wasn’t relevant in order to differences in updates. Concerning possible relationship between position and you can sitios de citas asiáticos legítimos many years partnered, extreme relationships was in fact found in fitness (X dos =14.7; df=4; p=.005; n=.16), even though having people y is out there (40.4%, each), having partners y is out there (43.4%). Put simply, toward classification with increased age married, husbands has straight down health reputation. Having youngsters regarding prior marriages and achieving children away from latest matrimony failed to somewhat apply at standing.

Inside the share, the newest analyses about the 2nd hypothesis showed that in contrast to the traditional, the greatest element relevant in order to standing ‘s the nation.

Univariate evaluation shown tall differences in factor step one (F=5

To contrast our third hypothesis, that predict that homogamy will be associated to higher marital satisfaction for both countries, we have estimated the scores in ong the three types of status (hypogamy, homogamy, and hypergamy) for the seven items of the scale. The analyses revealed significant differences in bda=.951, F(6, 584)= 2.47; p<.05]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 2 of marital satisfaction (F=4.54; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.01), with no significant differences by country. Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypergamy in health status have significantly smaller y situations (M=4.14, SE=0.11; and M=4.57, SE=0.10, respectively).

Also, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on education status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.938, F(6, 584)= 3.17; p<.01]. 46; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.03), and total scale (F=3.61; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.XX). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.04), as well as by the interaction of status by country (F=4.90; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.03). Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypogamic education status situations have significantly smaller ic situations (M=4.18, SE=0.11; and M=4.58, SE=0.11, respectively). In addition, hypergamy situations in Spain and Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain. Homogamy situations in Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain.

Finally, hypogamy situations into the Spain scored somewhat less than hypogamy situations for the Dominican Republic

Likewise, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on economic status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.937, F(6, 584)= 3.21; p<.01]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=6.64; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.04). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.03), with Dominicans scoring significantly higher than Spaniards (M=4.8, SE=.015, and M=4.34, SE=.10, respectively). Economic hypergamy was associated to significantly higher ic and hypogamic status. Spaniards with hypergamy status scored significantly higher than the other two groups from Spain. Dominicans with hypogamic status scored significantly lower than the other two groups from the same country.

Additionally, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on housekeeping status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.920, F(6, 584)= 4.12; p<.001]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=; df=2; p<.001; h 2 =.06), and total scale (F=6.84; df=2; p=.001; h 2 =.04), without significant differences by country. Hypogamy status was associated to significantly higher y status (M=4.88, SE=.14, M=4.34, SE=.07, respectively).